INFORMATION CHANGE THE WORLD

International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS)

ISSN: 2075-0161 (Print), ISSN: 2075-017X (Online)

Published By: MECS Press

IJMECS Vol.10, No.12, Dec. 2018

Active Learning: A New Assessment Model that Boost Confidence and Learning While Reducing Test Anxiety

Full Text (PDF, 380KB), PP.1-9


Views:124   Downloads:15

Author(s)

Arshia Khan, Janna Madden

Index Terms

Computer science education;active learning;test anxiety;student centered teaching;assessments

Abstract

Tests are a source of anxiety and have proved to impact the grades among students. In addition, students do not have the time to prepare for their exams. The ultimate goal of the instructor is to create and offer an environment that reduces the examination stress while maximizes learning in the little time available to the students. The demand on students’ available time is a major challenge. Although active learning has been utilized to increase student engagement and ultimately increase learning, it has never been used to reduce the test anxiety, increase learning in relation to available-student-time or attempt to increase learning with respect to available student time. Student time has been recognized as the most precious resource in learning. This paper proposes a mechanism of active learning, when employed can create an environment for less stressful exam taking while boosting and amplifying learning in a limited amount of time. Various pedagogical and psychological theories have been explored to develop this methodology that has been employed in three different semesters. The results have shown that students prefer this less stressful mechanism of testing and improved learning and students have commented that they felt they were on top of the materials being covered in class throughout the year and felt prepared for the final with little or no preparation for the final exam.  In addition, students felt reduced stress during the test taking. 

Cite This Paper

Arshia Khan, Janna Madden, "Active Learning: A New Assessment Model that Boost Confidence and Learning While Reducing Test Anxiety", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.10, No.12, pp. 1-9, 2018.DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2018.12.01

Reference

[1]Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. 1991. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

[2]Penner, J. G. 1984. Why Many College Teachers Cannot Lecture: How to Avoid Communication Breakdown in the Classroom. Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, 2600 South First Street, Springfield, IL 62717.

[3]Zeidner, Moshe. Test anxiety: The state of the art. Springer Science & Business Media, 1998.

[4]Cassady, Jerrell C., and Ronald E. Johnson. "Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance." Contemporary educational psychology 27.2 (2002): 270-295.

[5]Hembree, Ray. "Correlates, causes, effects, and treatment of test anxiety."Review of educational research 58.1 (1988): 47-77.

[6]Jackson, Rebecca. "Understanding Test Anxiety and What We Can Do to Help Children." The Huffington Post. N.p., 10 May 2015. Web. 18 Aug. 2016. 

[7]"Test Anxiety | Anxiety And Depression Association Of America, ADAA".Adaa.org. N. p., 2016. Web. 18 Aug. 2016.

[8]Pajares, Frank. "Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings." Review of educational research 66.4 (1996): 543-578.

[9]Multon, Karen D., Steven D. Brown, and Robert W. Lent. "Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation."Journal of counseling psychology 38.1 (1991): 30.

[10]Wagner, Richard K., and Robert J. Sternberg. "Tacit knowledge and intelligence in the everyday world." Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (1986): 51-83.

[11]Sternberg, Robert J., and Richard K. Wagner, eds. Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. CUP Archive, 1986.

[12]Marton, Ference, and Roger Säljö. "On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process." British journal of educational psychology 46.1 (1976): 4-11.

[13]Terenzini, Patrick, and Ernest Pascarella. "Studying College Students In The 21St Century: Meeting New Challenges". The Review of Higher Education 21.2 (2016): 151-165. Web. 14 Mar. 2016.

[14]Poll: More Parents Pay Cell Phone Bills Than Tuition "Poll: More Parents Pay Cell Phone Bills Than Tuition". The Huffington Post. N. p., 2016. Web. 15 Mar. 2016.

[15]The Condition of Education - Postsecondary Education - Characteristics of Postsecondary Students - Characteristics of Postsecondary Students - Indicator May (2015) "The Condition Of Education - Postsecondary Education - Characteristics Of Postsecondary Students - Characteristics Of Postsecondary Students - Indicator May (2015)". Nces.ed.gov. N. p., 2016. Web. 15 Mar. 2016.

[16]Earl, Lorna M. Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press, 2012.

[17]Wogan, Michael, and Rolland H. Waters. "The role of repetition in learning." The American journal of psychology (1959).

[18]Bromage, Bruce K., and Richard E. Mayer. "Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text." Journal of Educational Psychology 78.4 (1986): 271.

[19]Psy.ohio-state.edu. N. p., 2016. Web. 15 Mar. 2016.

[20]Mayer, Richard E. "Can you repeat that? Qualitative effects of repetition and advance organizers on learning from science prose." Journal of Educational Psychology 75.1 (1983): 40.

[21]Felder, Richard M., and Linda K. Silverman. "Learning and teaching styles in engineering education." Engineering education 78.7 (1988): 674-681.

[22]Hill, Gayle W. "Group versus individual performance: Are N+ 1 heads better than one?." Psychological bulletin 91.3 (1982): 517.

[23]Barr, Robert B., and John Tagg. “From Teaching to Learning: A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education”. Change 27.6 (1995): 12–25. Web.

[24]Paul, Stanley. "Students With Disabilities In Higher Education: A Review Of The Literature." College Student Journal 34.2 (2000): 200. SPORTDiscus with Full Text. Web. 15 Mar. 2016.

[25]"Vol 13: Promoting Active Learning Using The Results Of Physics Education Research (Article)". Science.uniserve.edu.au. N. p., 2016. Web. 16 Mar. 2016.

[26]Quinn, Diana, et al. "Leading change: Applying change management approaches to engage students in blended learning." Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

[27]Ames, Carole. "Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation." Journal of educational psychology 84.3(1992):261.

[28]Gross Davis, Barbara. "Tools for teaching." San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved July 1 (1993): 2011.

[29]Lucan, Sandra Goss, and Douglas A. Bernstein. "Teaching psychology: a step by step guide." (2005).

[30]Benjamin Jr, L. T. "Lecturing." The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (2002): 57-67.

[31]Wankat, Phillip C. The effective, efficient professor: Teaching, scholarship, and service. Allyn and Bacon, 2002.

[32]Chickering, Arthur W., and Zelda F. Gamson. "Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education." AAHE bulletin 3 (1987): 7.

[33]Chapell, Mark S., et al. "Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students." Journal of educational Psychology, `97.2 (2005): 268.

[34]Entwistle, Noel J., and Abigail Entwistle. "Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: the student experience and its implications." Higher education 22.3 (1991): 205-227.

[35]Casner-Lotto, Jill, and Linda Barrington. Are They Really Ready to Work? Employers' Perspectives on the Basic Knowledge and Applied Skills of New Entrants to the 21st Century US Workforce. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 1 Massachusetts Avenue NW Suite 700, Washington, DC 20001, 2006.